Stablecoin-linked cards are one of the fastest-growing segments in digital payments. And so far, Visa is running away with it: According to some data providers, more than 90% of monthly crypto card volume flows over its network.

The lead traces back to an early bet. In 2019, Visa launched Fast Track, giving fintech startups a direct path into its rails. The compounding effect is visible today: over 130 stablecoin-linked card programs, spanning the industry’s largest centralized players like Coinbase, decentralized ones like EtherFi, and dedicated crypto card issuers like Rain.

Now, Mastercard is eager to play catch up. Yesterday, the company launched its Crypto Partner Program, bringing together 85+ companies, including Circle, Binance, Solana, and PayPal.

The list basically reads like crypto’s Yellow Pages. Now the question is how quickly these logos turn into higher market share and new products.

In today’s edition, we take you behind the scenes of:

  • Onchain treasury management and how crypto-native players are going enterprise

  • Boerse Stuttgart Group and Nasdaq partner on tokenized settlement.

HIGH SIGNAL NEWS

TOP STORY

Onchain Treasury Management: Crypto-Native Players Are Pushing Upstream Into Enterprises

Onchain treasury: Some of our most recent conversations with financial institutions indicate that interest in stablecoin-based treasury management is growing. The momentum is driven by broader adoption of stablecoins as a payment rail, the emergence of regulatory frameworks in both Europe and the U.S., and the rise of complementary products like tokenized money market funds, a topic we covered in depth last week with WisdomTree.

  • Why it matters: Blockchain-based infrastructure could meaningfully optimize corporate treasury by enabling 24/7, near-instant transfers, reducing cash in transit, compressing closing cycles, and allowing companies to redeploy cash without waiting for traditional banking cutoffs. Today, the most concrete use cases include intragroup liquidity transfers, cross-border supplier payments, and yield optimization through tokenized money market funds that accrue continuously and can be redeemed around the clock.

New competition from outside: Until now, development for onchain corporate treasury solutions has been largely driven by major banks like JPMorgan, Citi, and HSBC through their respective tokenized deposit solutions and private networks. What’s changing is that the market is now getting tackled from the other direction, too: an increasing number of crypto-native companies are building stablecoin-based treasury solutions and selling upstream into enterprises.

The build-out is accelerating: In just the past weeks, a string of announcements has underlined the growing commercial interest:

  • Circle published a case study showing how it uses USDC and its own Mint platform for intercompany settlement, completing ~90% of transfer pricing activity in a single day.

  • Ripple introduced Ripple Treasury, a platform developed with GTreasury that combines traditional enterprise treasury tools with digital asset infrastructure.

  • BitGo and Stable Sea partnered to offer a treasury solution designed to support B2B stablecoin payments and access to tokenized RWAs.

  • Privy, a Stripe subsidiary, continues to build out its programmable wallet infrastructure with an explicit focus on stablecoin treasury management.

__________________

Industry perspectives: To better understand where adoption stands today and what is still missing, we spoke with three players approaching the market from different angles.

  1. The payment infrastructure provider perspective (BCB Group), on what kind of solution could unlock adoption at scale.

  2. The blockchain infrastructure provider perspective (Matter Labs), on the main requirements of traditional players when building their infrastructure.

  3. The onchain asset management perspective (Spiko), on which types of companies are most likely to adopt these solutions first.

Jérôme Prigent is Managing Director Europe at BCB Group, a regulated payments and trading infrastructure provider serving both traditional and digital asset firms. Its core clients include exchanges, market makers, and OTC desks. One of its flagship products is BLINC, a 24/7 fiat settlement network that also supports stablecoins.

Where do traditional institutions stand today when it comes to adopting onchain treasury management?

Traditional institutions are beginning to explore onchain treasury use cases, but adoption remains at an early stage, with significant education still needed across the market. So far, blockchain is primarily being used for specific verticals rather than as core treasury infrastructure: stablecoins for cross-border payments and intercompany transfers, tokenized money market funds for deploying excess liquidity, and onchain lending markets for short-term capital deployment.

The challenge is that these capabilities remain highly fragmented. They are offered by different platforms, built on different infrastructures, and rarely integrated into a single operational environment. Treasury teams cannot yet manage liquidity, payments, and investments through a unified onchain stack, and integrating what exists into ERP systems, accounting infrastructure, and compliance frameworks remains genuinely difficult.

What the market still lacks is a full stack: institutional-grade custody, fiat on- and off-ramps, stablecoin payment rails, access to short-term liquidity markets, and integration with tokenized investment products. The technology exists. The components don’t yet talk to each other.

Vassilis Tziokas is Vice President of Ecosystem Growth at Matter Labs, the firm behind ZKsync's Prividium, a Ethereum Layer-2 infrastructure solution purpose-built for financial institutions. Matter Labs is currently supporting pilot initiatives with multiple banks across the United States and Europe.

In your conversations with traditional institutions about onchain treasury, what are the recurring questions?

The first set of questions is always the same: privacy, compliance, and sovereignty over the infrastructure. Can anyone see our transaction flows? Does this meet our regulatory requirements? Are we dependent on a network owned by a potential competitor?

What becomes more interesting is what comes up in the third, fourth, or fifth conversation. Two questions tend to emerge consistently. The first is integration: no institution is going to rip out its SAP or Oracle systems just to run treasury on a blockchain. Onchain infrastructure needs to plug into existing systems, ERPs, accounting platforms, and compliance frameworks.

The second question is: who is actually going to build this for us? There is no bank or multinational with the internal engineering capacity to deploy this kind of infrastructure on its own. That gap between interest and execution is probably one of the most underestimated obstacles in this market today.

Paul-Adrien Hyppolite is the co-founder and CEO of Spiko, a Paris-based startup operating the largest euro-denominated tokenized money market fund (EUTBL) deployed on permissionless infrastructure, with more than €800 million subscribed. In January, the company secured a MiFID investment firm license, enabling it to passport its services across the European Economic Area (EEA).

Which types of companies are likely to adopt onchain treasury solutions first?

First, these solutions are particularly valuable for SMEs, which typically have far more limited access to sophisticated treasury services than large multinational corporations. While large companies benefit from dedicated banking relationships and advanced liquidity management tools, smaller firms often rely on much simpler, and often less efficient, financial infrastructure.

Onchain solutions can help bridge that gap. By automating payments, improving liquidity management and yield optimization through programmable financial infrastructure, blockchain can give SMEs access to capabilities that were traditionally reserved for large institutions.

This is already what we see in practice. The majority of our clients today are SMEs that may not even realize they are using blockchain infrastructure. They simply experience a more efficient financial product, even though the underlying infrastructure is onchain.

__________________

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The operational case is compelling. Blockchain-based treasury infrastructure could meaningfully reduce settlement times, free up idle cash, and give companies access to yield products around the clock

  • The market is being tackled from two directions. Major banks have been building tokenized deposit rails on private networks for years. Now, crypto-native companies are building stablecoin-based treasury products and selling upstream into enterprises.

  • The category is still nascent. Broad adoption faces real obstacles: fragmented infrastructure, limited integration with existing ERP and accounting systems, a lack of internal engineering capacity at most institutions, and an education gap that persists even at the CFO level.

  • SMEs may be the first to adopt. Unlike large multinationals with dedicated banking relationships and sophisticated treasury tools, smaller companies have historically lacked access to more efficient and sophisticated liquidity management.

What’s the news?

  • On Monday, Boerse Stuttgart Group announced a strategic partnership with Nasdaq to use Seturion, its blockchain-based settlement platform for tokenized assets.

  • Europe’s sixth-largest exchange group aims to position Seturion as the reference pan-European platform for tokenized settlement, with the global market infrastructure provider becoming its first strategic partner.

  • The platform is currently in the process of obtaining a DLT Pilot Regime license, a transitional regulatory framework designed to enable the testing of distributed ledger technology (DLT) within market infrastructures in the European Union.

Behind the scenes: We spoke with Lidia Kurt, CEO of Seturion, to understand the efficiency gains Nasdaq could achieve by using the platform, and why they chose to focus on structured products first.

  1. Making the case for tokenized collateral (Nasdaq) — A report exploring how tokenization could improve collateral mobilization and efficiency in financial markets, reducing margin management frictions while enabling faster settlement and better balance sheet usage.

  2. Stablecoin shocks (IMF) — A paper analyzing how stablecoin adoption affects U.S. financial markets, showing that demand shocks can lower short-term Treasury yields, weaken the dollar, and benefit payment providers without clear risk for banks.

  3. From the unbanked to the unbrokered (Coinbase) — A report exploring how blockchain infrastructure could enable direct market access without traditional banking or brokerage intermediaries, expanding participation in financial services.

→ Want more? Visit Blockstories Library for a curated selection of 120+ reports on digital assets.

Login or Subscribe to participate

Disclaimer: The information provided in the Institutional Briefing by Blockstories does not constitute investment advice. Accordingly, we assume no liability for any investment decisions made based on the content presented herein.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading